The Pasco County Commission has approved a project with 280 apartments and 49,500 square feet of commercial, on the north side of State Road 54, between Wesley Chapel Boulevard and Collier Parkway.
Commissioners voted 4-1 to approve the rezoning request, with Commissioner Mike Moore objecting vociferously.
Attorney Clarke Hobby represented the A.G. Spanos Companies and the Aiken Trust on the request, which involves a 25.4-acre site, about 2 miles west of the interchange of State Road 56 and Interstate 75.
Both county planners and the Pasco County Planning Commission had recommended approval of the request.
During the Planning Commission public hearing, Hobby told that board that A.G. Spanos Companies has built more than 100,000 multifamily Class A apartments across the United States during the past 50 years.
The main access to the site will be from the intersection of State Road 54 and Oak Grove Boulevard, an existing signalized intersection.
The commercial portion is planned near the front of the property, to take advantage of the traffic light.
Objections were raised to the proposed rezoning during the Planning Commission meeting by some neighbors in the Twin Lakes community, but no one objected during the County Commission’s hearing.
“We got the consent of the adjacent homeowners and we did that by working hard,” Hobby said.
The attorney said his client has been working with the neighborhood and with county staff to improve the project.
The applicants agreed to provide a long access road to improve interconnectivity in the project, they reduced the height of the apartments and they created a large setback, Hobby said.
The attorney also noted that the project fits in with the county’s vision for the South Market Area, which calls for higher density, mixed-use development clustered around existing arterial roadways.
The idea is to avoid spreading out density like peanut butter, and instead create a true urbanized area, Hobby said.
Planning expert Kelly Love, director of entitlement planning at Clearview Land Design in Tampa, also spoke on behalf of Hobby’s clients.
“The plan is for the South Market Area to evolve from a suburban bedroom community development pattern, with inefficient utilization of land, to one which incorporates verticality, density and urban form,” she said.
“The Aiken mixed-use amendment before you today, contributes to this land use evolution.
“We’re trying to put the density, the mixed-use and the connectivity in an infill development, which has transit right at its front door,” she said.
And, while Moore has consistently voiced opposition to the proliferation of apartments being developed in the State Road 54/State Road 56 corridor, Hobby said that a market study was done and it shows that Pasco County’s multifamily is not overbuilt.
“Our overall renter percentage ownership compared to other suburban or urbanized areas is very low. We’re at roughly 22.5 percent; Manatee is at 27.8; Hillsborough is at 40.
“So, we are way below everyone else. We are in a healthy market. There’s a demand there. We’ve got a great project. We’ve got a great builder,” Hobby said.
But, Moore reiterated his objections.
“It’s no secret about my disdain for the amount of apartment complexes that are going up along the 54/56 corridor, especially east of Collier Parkway up to Bruce B. Downs,” Moore said.
“My concern is that what this board is doing and continuing to do, along with what previous staff members have done with the South Market Area, is you’re going to be very disappointed, 10, 15, 20 years down the road,” he said.
He then rattled off a list of 13 apartment developments within a 5-mile radius.
Moore also said the residents and business owners who live within the area “are sick and tired of apartments on (State Road) 54 and (State Road) 56. It’s a fact. I hear it all of the time.”
When people come to Pasco County and head on State Road 56, they see apartments, Moore said.
“The market might be good right now, but you’re saturating the market in that one small section. This county is big. It’s a very large county. If we keep putting them up in this area, we’re going to pay for it,” the commissioner predicted.
He asked his colleagues to take another look at the county’s comprehensive plan and policies in its South Market Area to address the issue.
“We’re rezoning and rezoning and rezoning, to allow MF (multifamily),” Moore said. “When is enough, enough?”
Other commissioners appeared open to having a workshop session to take a closer look at the issue, but when Moore mentioned the possibility of a temporary moratorium until that can be worked through, he found no support.
A temporary moratorium, Commissioner Kathryn Starkey said, would be “pretty drastic.”
“You’re seeing all of this density here because the market needs it. We have 100 people moving to Pasco a day. Where are they supposed to live?” Starkey said.
There are also people who are downsizing and people who can’t afford to buy a house, she said.
Still, she added, “I don’t mind taking a look at it to see, ‘What is that right number?’
“And, we purposely put density on the (State Road) 54 corridor to save us from sprawl, right, and to allow one day to support transit,” Starkey said..
Commissioner Mike Wells said he agrees that the board needs to take a look at the issue.
At the same time, however, Wells noted: “I think the market decides, not us.”
Commissioner Jack Mariano said, “We were trying to avoid sprawl. Do I think that we’re getting what we thought we’d get? I will say, no.“
He thinks there are “way too many apartments.
“I would much rather see us take another look at this. Condos would be a lot better. Fee-simple townhomes would be a lot better. I want people invested in their community,” Mariano said.
Commission Chairman Ron Oakley agreed that the board should hold a workshop to take a closer look.
At the same time, commissioners said they want to take a look at the county’s mobility fee incentives and discuss which categories should receive them.
No date has been set for that workshop yet.
Published October 30, 2019
David M says
Maybe if these meetings were held during hours that working citizens could attend, you would hear the truth about how neighboring residents feel about this project. None of my neighbors that I know in Twin Lakes have changed their minds about NOT wanting these apartments built. I emailed all the commissioners, vehemently opposing these apartments. Seems that only 1 person has our interests as a county at heart and only one can see the negative factors these apartments will bring
Monica Oberdorfer says
Consent from adjoining homeowners?? really ??
Melissa says
No one asked this adjoining neighbor!
Joey says
Instead of building all of these apartments it would be great to see condos. There are no condos in that area. I’m a Realtor and I know they would sell.
Angry neighbor says
They all lie—I am right up against this land—no one talked to us!
“We realized there are about 10 or 12 houses that are adjacent to where the multifamily area will be back here, but we agreed to a 75-foot setback from our property boundary that effectively will create a 90- to a 100-foot setback from any home in here,” the attorney said.
All BS—they have bulldozed right up to my backyard fence. They have plans to put a 15 FOOT buffer….no 75 foot —Oh, and it looks like they are going to put the dumpster right behind the houses–not on the other side away from them. Crooked Politicians servicing rich corporations.
Rich says
Obviously the lawyer is stretching the “truth” regarding the building of this apartment complex. Not one resident of Twin Lakes wants this intrusion of our quiet and basically crime free neighborhood. The Developers think we are stupid…we know that when they can’t (won’t) completely rent everything, Section 8 will step in to save their investment….
Stephanie Scheno says
Yeah, Hillsborough is at 40 and LOOK at it. I briefly rented in Hillsborough after relocating for a job and before buying my home in Pasco. It was like living in a slum. My neighbors were not the kinds of people you would want to attract to live in your county. It was not safe, and what had been a nice area years ago is now run down and overdeveloped due to poor planning and money grabbing developers.
Keep building apartments and this beautiful area will be a run down ghetto in 15-20 years. People in apartments are not invested in their community, and they don’t bring the kind of value to the county that different kinds of building would bring. You want to build homes and businesses, NOT apartments.
The only people who would want so many apartments built there must not live in this area and simply want quick cash and have no concern over what Pasco is going to look like in another couple of decades. Sad.
Debra Akram says
Our house literally shakes all day long into the night. We never agreed to this travesty! The wildlife has been destroyed and the animals are suffering. Shame on all of you!
Aileen G. says
Traffic is horrendous making it nearly impossible to enter and exit the Twin Lakes subdivision safely. These new apartments will just make the traffic situation even worse. I live in the back of the subdivision, but the loss of trees with the start of construction has made the road noise from 54/56 so much worse. Not too long ago, apartments in Tampa were converted into condos. I can see that happening here in the near future.
Christine says
The residents in Twin Lakes did not agree to any of this. The noise is incessant and by the amount of people that will potentially be there it’s not going to get any better. Machines start before 7:00 am and continues until after 10:00pm. If you work shift work as many of our first responders do forget about sleeping.
I bought my house in Twin Lakes 2016 with a backyard view of the woods. I didn’t sign up for this. No one asked us about this. We couldn’t attend meetings because we were working when they were being held. It’s sad we don’t put our current Pasco county residents first.